top of page

A Creditor’s Guide To Summary Judgements In Malaysia

  • Writer: Rule & Co Editorial Team
    Rule & Co Editorial Team
  • 2 days ago
  • 3 min read

For creditors in Malaysia initiating a civil suit, a summary judgement under Order 14 of the Rules of Court 2012 grants a full court order in their favour at the pre-trial stage.


This significantly improves recovery chances by allowing debt enforcement to begin sooner.


full safe to show how summary judgement allows fast action and debt enforcement
Two more weeks and this would be completely empty.

Unlike a judgement in default which relies on luck, a summary judgement is something we can often plan for early on, and below we explain how it works, including:


  • how a typical pre-trial stage goes

  • initiating a summary judgement application, and

  • our professional thoughts


Of course, feel free to skip the guide and get in touch for a free recovery assessment.



Otherwise, let’s begin.


Typical pre-trial stage of a civil suit


The case starts as the creditor’s solicitor files a writ of summons with the court detailing the nature of the debt and the claim sought.


sample writ of summons
Writ of summons sample.

The writ is then served on the defendant, who has 14 days to file a Memorandum of Appearance to show they wish to dispute the claim.


This initiates a ‘pleading cycle’ which at minimum consists of:


  • the plaintiff’s Statement of Claim, and

  • the defendant’s Defence


Everyone then attends a Pre-Trial Case Management session where the court gives directions for the case to proceed to trial.


Filing for summary judgement


A summary judgment application can be filed as soon as the debtor has entered their initial appearance, pausing the usual pleading cycle.


This is done with a supporting affidavit known as Form 13 that:


  • verifies the facts on which the claim is based, and 

  • justifies why the debtor has no arguable defense to it


Sample summary judgement application known as Form 13 under order 14 of rules ofcourt 2012
Sample Form 13 application.

Once the application has been filed with the court, it is served on the debtor who is given 14 days to submit an affidavit of their own explaining why the matter deserves to be heard.


Both parties then attend a summary judgement hearing where the judge may find:


  1. There is a triable issue and the application is set aside.

  2. There is no legal defence and grants the creditor a summary judgement.


If our application is successful, two types of judgments can be granted depending on the claim.


Final vs interlocutory summary judgements


A final summary judgement can be served on the debtor immediately while an interlocutory judgement requires an additional hearing for the court to decide on the figure to award.


Which one a creditor is granted depends on the nature of the claim sought:


  • liquidated damages (specific sum of money) ➡ final judgement

  • unliquidated damages (undetermined figure) ➡ interlocutory judgement

  • in detinue (detention of movable property) ➡  interlocutory judgement

  • mixed (specific sum of money and undetermined figure) ➡  both


Once the judgement is served on the debtor, they are given 30 days to attempt to have it set aside before it becomes a fully enforceable court order.


Our professional thoughts


A summary judgement can be an effective counter against a debtor with no legal defence who tries to weaponise the litigation process to pressure a creditor into giving up.


stubborn_child as a humorous reference to debtor that is an ideal candidate for summary judgement
When their best excuse is “La-la-la-la can’t hear you.” 

As we said, when the facts support it, summary judgement applications can be planned for early on, and some of the strongest candidates include:


  • unpaid invoices where goods or services were clearly delivered

  • debts acknowledged in writing by the debtor

  • dishonoured settlement agreements

  • clear contractual payment obligations with little room for factual dispute, and

  • claims supported by signed agreements, purchase orders, invoices, and delivery records


However, assessing a debtor’s defence is just one of our three main factors when advising on whether a debt is worth taking to court, and to recommend litigation, we also like to see a claim value of at least RM100,000 and signs the debtor is able to pay.


That’s all from us, and we wish you a smooth debt recovery 🙂


Let Rule & Co handle your debt litigation



If your reminders have been ignored or you simply don’t want the hassle of chasing debtors, Rule & Co is a debt recovery law firm that helps creditors recover debts via legal strategies that minimise upfront cost, maximise recovery, and safeguard your reputation.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


Whatsapp: +6 010 202 8095

LG1-2, Seri Gembira Avenue, No. 6, Jalan Senang Ria,

Kuchai Lama, 58200 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

  • Whatsapp
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

(c) 2020 Rule & Co. Advocates & Solicitors

bottom of page